In fact, it is safe to say that over the past years, humans have served more as 'animal models' for zoo species than is true of the reverse. Aren't we preserving genetic material at the expense of the animals themselves. There is a moral presumption against keeping animals in captivity.
Zoos also carry out important research into subjects like animal behaviour and how to treat illnesses.
Their enthusiasm for the games was so great that even the first tigers brought to Rome, gifts to Caesar Augustus from an Indian ruler, wound up in the arena.
Somehow related to the previous pros on this list, zoos provide a chance for people to learn more about some animals that they would not have a chance to otherwise. Is it logical to keep animals in zoos. This could include releasing the animals back to the wild after a given period. Much of this research, as well as other field research that is supported by zoos, could just as well be funded in a different way— say, by a government agency.
On the other hand, by bringing people and animals together, zoos have the potential to educate the public about conservation issues and inspire people to protect animals and their habitats. Either we have duties to animals or we do not. There is some reason for questioning the commitment of zoos to preservation: Eleven thousand animals were slaughtered, including lions, tigers, elephants, rhinoceroses, hippopotami, giraffes, bulls, stags, crocodiles and serpents.
Even if breeding programmes were run in the best possible way, there are limits to what can be done to save endangered species. This could be helpful in saving more of them. But just as the fact that some police are corrupt does not mean we should not have people to enforce the law, although bad zoos or exhibits persist does not mean they are not worthwhile institutes.
Both of these positions are surely extreme. OK, not all zoos are good at engagement. Studies in anatomy and pathology are the most common forms of zoo research. But are zoos changing and developing.
They should be allowed to live natural healthy lives in the wild. Roadside zoos, petting zoos, and smaller animal exhibitors tend to offer inadequate space for the animals, keeping them in pens or cages. Sometimes, barren concrete and metal bars are all a tiger or bear will know for their entire lives.
Keeping animals captive at the expense of their health is clearly wrong. No amount of effort will be able to replicate an animal’s natural habit This may not apply to all animals, but it applies to most. The spawning of so-called “roadside zoos”—an exploitative enterprise known for its systematic negligence and abuse of animals—are some of the most egregious cases-in-point.
Whether the parents of the four-year-old or inadequate safety standards were to blame, the real problem is that this gorilla, like all zoo animals, was living in captivity, incarcerated in a small. 1. Zoos pose several risks that particularly affect animals.
There are many problems that come with keeping animals in zoos. One of them is the confined spaces where the animals are forced to live in. Unlike their natural habitats where they can freely roam, these establishments keep them confined.
About the Association of Zoos & Aquariums Leaders in Animal Care, Conservation, and Family Fun AZA is a (c)3 non-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of zoos and aquariums in the areas of conservation, education, science, and recreation.Jamiesons opinion on the four primary reasons for keeping animals in the zoos